Chola Administration& Kautilya

Q1. release a note on the village constitution ( village assemblies) of the Cholas during the Early Medieval period. A. The Chola kings followed a highly prompt system of administration. The entire Tanjore district, bumps ofTrichy, Pudukottai and South Arcot districts formed the part of the Chola Mandalam. The Cholas had tercet major administrative divisions c whollyed of import regimen, churl presidential term and Local Government. Tanjore was the capital of the Cholas. The efficient Chola administrative system has been not bad(predicate) appreciated by many an(prenominal) historians and rulers. telephone exchange Government: The Central Government t under the lintelship of the King. Council of ministers and officials took active part in running the administration of Central Government. The higher officials were c wholeed Peruntaram and the lower officials were called Siruntaram. bucolic administration: The Chola Empire was split up into nine provinces. They were overly called mandalams. The head of the province was called viceroy. Close relatives of kings were appointed as viceroys. The Viceroys were in incessant touch with the Central Government. Viceroys received orders from the king. They sent fifty-fifty suffice to the king. The viceroys had a large number of officials to assist them in the change state of administration. Administrative Divisions: The success of the Chola administration depended more on the strait-laced functioning of the administrative division us. hirerly mandalams were named after the overlord names or the titles of the Chola kings. apiece mandalam was shared out into number of Kottams or Valanadus. Each kottam was sub divided into nadu. Each nadu was further divided into (Urs) villages which form part of the last whole of the administration. Uttaramerur inscriptions speak virtually the administration of the Cholas. Justice: The Chola king was the chief justice. The Chola kings gave enough maintenance f or the legal administration. The village le! vel juridic administration was carried on by the village assembly. Minor disputes were comprehend by the village assembly. Disputes were settled with proper evidences. Punishments were awarded by the judicial officers. The trial of sedate offences and major cases were conducted by the king himself. Q2. Write an account of the Kautilyas component to the development of the Judicial System in Ancient India. Kautilyas Arthashastra and Manus scratch of Law have been considered as the mostimportant treatises on the civil and execrable laws in ancient India. Several bragging(a) Indologistshave evaluated the original contributions of these treatises. They grow that The Arthashastra wasone of the simple sources of Manus Code of Law.1 Also, it seems that Manus sole clinical inwriting the codes was to reestablish the neighborly hierarchy, which was in many ways oppressive.2Whereas Kautilya treasured to build a prosperous, secure, safe, secular and fairness-based empire.3He considere d both honorable and sparing perspectives on creating laws. His marriage offer on tort lawcontained many noteworthy elements. First, he introduced pecuniary fines to complement theexisting satisfaction measures for preventing losings caused due to negligence. Second, liabilitieswere based on negligence since that was considered as preserving and promoting ethical values.

Third, deterrence being the primary goal, tort law was knowing to minimize the chance of aloss caused by negligence or clothedion. That is, riches maximization was the overriding concern. Fourth, punitive damages particularly if intent was inv olved were large and all the receipts wentto the Trea! sury. Fifth, in amplification to the punitive damages, the injurer was required to compensatethe victim for serious physical injuries and for all financial losses and politics wasresponsible for taking care of the alter individuals out of the global revenue. It appears that,to rough extent, corrective justice was a part of distributive justice. Pre-Kautilyan writers had originally elaborated on reconciliation methods for freeing the defendant from his sins and were think to enhance deterrence by modifying his behavior. Kautilyas objective was to complement the expiation methods with the introduction of the secular law. His unexpressed analysis is made hard-core in section II. Kautilyas approaching regarding torts was essentially to minimize the probability of accidents, and if they still happened, the state was to gain vigor high fines from the injurers to supplement the general revenue of the government. BIBLIOGRAPHY1. Romila Thapar, The peninsula: Establishing Authori ties and structures2. Sreenivasa Murthy: chronicle of India for Law Students3. S.C. Raychoudhury: Social heathen and Economic History of India If you ask to get a secure essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay